Editors note: Pat Mulloy is a member of CPA’s advisory board. Trump moved into a bipartisan policy vacuum on China. The political mainstream needs a

Editors note: Another good high tech investment in 5G coming to the US. The administration’s tariffs and sanctions on Huawei are starting to make a

Editors note: Any candidate who will not fully repudiate any TPP-like agreement is hiding his/her views, will be “for” those economically destructive agreements and therefore should

Editors note: Purposefully vague comments by the president on the next step towards possible future decoupling.  The U.S. could hit another $300 billion in Chinese

Editor’s note: No one is calling for the elimination of gov’t procurement rules in trade deals, unfortunately. Either b/c they don’t want to or b/c

Editor’s note. We may be doing this whole tariff delay thing again. Or not. The press has a poor track record of prognostication on trade

Editor’s note: Trump is highlighting the dollar misalignment more these days. The fact that he is talking about interest rate difference between the EU and

Editorial note: This article references a letter from 600 businesses in favor of tariffs that CPA helped generate last week. If you want to know

Editors note: Peter Navarro does a great job defending an aggressive trade stance on China. He and Charles Payne, the news host, reference the letter

Editor’s note: The global steel import lobby has sued to challenge the constitutionality of the administration’s 232 steel tariffs. The suit, in CPA’s view, is