Section 301 Tariffs On China, Part 4 Editor’s note: Part Four of a series on the Section 301 tariffs on Chinese products by CPA Buy American Committee co-chair James Stuber. Read part three here [James Stuber | August 28, 2019 | The American Dossier | Part four of a four-part series] In the previous…
Details
Section 301 Tariffs On China, Part 3 Editor’s note: Part Three of a series on the Section 301 tariffs on Chinese products by CPA Buy American Committee co-chair James Stuber. Read part two here [James Stuber | August 22, 2019 | The American Dossier| Part three of a four-part series] Many commentators bemoan the higher…
Details
Excerpt: Consumers are not seeing the prices increases that economists predicted. Inflation is extremely low — and remains unaffected by tariffs. Think all Americans are shouldering a big burden because of Trump’s key actions against China over trade cheating and more? [Michael Stumo | September 6, 2019 | LifeZette] Economists have a day of reckoning…
Details
Editor’s note: Industrial policy is needed in the pantheon of fiscal, tariff, exchange rate and monetary policies. The US needs to get good at it, with metrics. And use tariffs to neutralize waves of subsidized competition from determined foreign governments. Daily Caller News Foundation Editor’s note: This piece is part of American Renewal, a new policy…
Details
Section 301 Tariffs On China, Part 2 Editor’s note: Part Two of a series on the Section 301 tariffs on Chinese products by CPA Buy American Committee co-chair James Stuber. Read part one here [James Stuber | August 13, 2019 | The American Dossier| Part two of a four-part series] The forced technology transfers and…
Details
Section 301 Tariffs on China, Part 1 Editor’s note: Part One of a series on the Section 301 tariffs on Chinese products by CPA Buy American Committee co-chair James Stuber. [James Stuber | August 6, 2019 | The American Dossier| Part one of a four-part series] After twenty-five years of giving American technology, capital, and…
Details
Editor’s note: The massive phantom foreign direct investment described in this article shows why CPA’s proposal for sales factor apportionment is needed for the US tax system. If companies were taxed, as we propose, on profits from sales in the US, shifting their profits to shell companies other countries would no longer benefit them. Empty…
Details
Editors note: CPA member Roger Simmermaker explains how free traders wrongly focus on efficiency and low prices instead of production and employment. Exclusive: Roger Simmermaker warns of cost of ‘efficiency uber alles’ [Roger Simmermaker | September 8, 2019| WND] It is no secret that free traders worship free trade as a religion. Syndicated columnist and…
Details
Editor’s note: WaPo would be called protectionist if taking about trade instead of journalism in this editorial. “For many years, U.S. policy was guided by the logic that it is best to remain open, to showcase a commitment to values and principle. But what if China doesn’t care and doesn’t change its approach?” CHINA’S LEADERS…
Details
Editors note: Another reason sales factor apportionment tax is needed. Capital flows for tax avoidance and profit shifting purposes should not exist. Tax profits based upon destination of sales rather than origin of income, which is manipulated. Study into global FDI finds nearly 40% of flows used as vehicle for financial engineering [Martin Sandbu |…
Details