Trade policy and the Trans-Pacific Partnership have become contentious topics on the campaign trail in several Senate and House races, including in North Carolina and

As the chairman and CEO of Charlotte-based Nucor Steel for more than 12 years, my job was to run a company that employed over 24,000

WASHINGTON ― As Hillary Clinton’s election victory appears increasingly likely, liberal groups already have their sights on the next battle: defeating the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade deal.

A dozen agriculture groups spent nearly an hour discussing trade and other key policy priorities with representatives of Donald Trump’s presidential campaign Monday, a discussion

In the article, “In Pushing TPP, President Obama Says He Has ‘Better Argument’ Than Trump or Clinton” the President offered several arguments for the trade

[Josh Harkinson | August 18, 2016 | Mother Jones] Until very recently, grousing about the pitfalls of global trade was seen as akin to complaining about

We’ve pointed out before how topsy turvy things have become with the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP) agreement lately, and it seems to be getting even

Brigadier General John Adams: By facilitating the further offshoring of America’s manufacturing base, the trade pact would actually undermine America’s military readiness and global economic standing.

Australia’s new shadow trade minister, Jason Clare, and his Labor Party representing the opposition in the Australian Senate are facing pressure to come out against

by Michael Stumo Toomey just announced that he opposes TPP. His reasons are not the trade deficit or currency manipulation. Rather he cites Pharma, IP