Why Beef Prices Are So High: America’s Cattle Industry Has Been Gutted

KEY POINTS

Beef prices are rising because cattle are scarce: The U.S. cattle herd has fallen to 86.2 million head, the smallest in 75 years.
Imports have not solved the problem: U.S. beef import volume is up 86% since 2021, yet beef prices are up 56% over the same period.
America has lost its ranching base: The U.S. had 732,123 cattle ranches in 2022, down 17% from 2017, with over 450,000 lost cattle ranches since 1997.
Ranchers are not a high-profit industry: In 2024, 71% of farms and ranches had operating profit margins below 10%.
Rebuilding domestic supply is the only durable way to bring prices down, but ranchers need long-term confidence to expand, especially with current conditions:
- About 75% of the U.S. beef cow herd is currently in drought;
- New World screwworm has disrupted Mexican live-cattle flows; and
- Four meatpackers control roughly 85% of the fed-cattle market.

U.S. beef prices continue to climb, with May 2026 prices already 22% above January 2025 levels [1]. This is a serious cost-of-living issue for American families, but it is also a crisis signal for the beef industry.

The United States has allowed its domestic cattle industry to be weakened for decades. Today’s high prices show the result: a smaller herd, fewer ranchers, greater dependence on imports, and a supply chain with little room to handle drought, disease, or processing disruptions.

As of 2026, the U.S. has 86.2 million head of cattle and calves, the smallest total herd size in 75 years [2]. The country has fewer cattle, fewer ranchers, greater dependence on imported beef, and a meatpacking sector so concentrated that disruptions at a handful of plants can ripple through the entire market.

Imports Have Not Lowered Beef Prices

That is why beef prices remain high even after policymakers reach for the same failed answer: more imports. As shown in Figure 1, U.S. beef import volume is up 86% since 2021 [3]. During the same time period, beef prices jumped 56% [1]. Imports nearly doubling in just 5 years has not prevented the current price surge. Imports are not the answer. Instead, America needs more ranchers, more cattle, more domestic processing competition, and a national policy committed to rebuilding U.S. beef production.

FIGURE 1:

Domestic Cattle Supply is the Bottleneck

USDA’s Meat Price Spreads data show where the pressure is coming from. From June 2024 to May 2026, retail Choice beef prices rose 27% [4]. But live cattle prices rose even faster, climbing 37%. That means the biggest pressure is coming from the animal itself. Cattle have become the scarce input, and packers, retailers, and consumers are all bidding against a U.S. cattle supply that has been cut too deeply.

The record-small cattle herd is already constraining production. Total weekly cattle slaughter fell to 524,000 head for the week ending June 13, 2026, down 6.5% from a year earlier, while steer and heifer slaughter fell 8.1% [5]. Beef production fell 2.8% to 468.9 million pounds even though average carcass weights rose from 863 pounds to 897 pounds, showing that heavier cattle are only partially offsetting the lack of total cattle [5]. Fed plant capacity utilization also fell to 76.0%, down from 77.9% a year earlier [5]. The system simply does not have enough cattle to keep production running at normal levels, and higher prices cannot create instant supply relief because cattle take years to raise. Rebuilding the herd is the only durable solution.

High cattle prices also should not be confused with a healthy ranching sector. The 2022 USDA Census of Agriculture showed that the United States had 732,123 cattle ranches remaining, down 17% from 2017 [6]. In total, America has lost 456,536 cattle ranches since 1997 [7]. And USDA projects the problem will continue, with U.S. cattle production expected to fall in both 2026 and 2027 [8].

Nor should higher cattle prices be mistaken for easy profits. Broader USDA data show how financially difficult farming and ranching remain. In 2024, 71% of all farms and ranches were in the high-risk category, meaning they had operating profit margins below 10% [9]. Small family farms also hold a substantial part of the market, accounting for 24% of total U.S. beef production [8]. But the pressure is even worse for these smaller operations: 82% of small family farms and ranches were in the high-risk zone [8].

These small family farms and ranches are asset-heavy but income-thin businesses, with land, equipment, livestock, debt, and weather risk, but limited cash profits. High cattle prices may help some producers with animals to sell, but they do not erase the deeper reality: raising cattle is capital-intensive, risky, and increasingly hard to sustain. And these risks are already showing up in the form of drought, animal-health threats, and processing disruptions.

Drought, Disease, and Concentration Are Slowing the Rebuild

Drought makes the crisis worse because ranching starts with grass, water, hay, and forage. Currently, about 75% of the U.S. beef cow herd is in drought, compared with a long-term average near 20% [9]. Even with cattle prices high, many ranchers are holding back from expansion. Dry pastures, expensive feed and supplies, higher interest rates, and market uncertainty make it risky to keep more young female cattle, or heifers, for breeding.

That is the trap. The country needs more cattle, but the rebuild is slow and cautious, not a full expansion. Ranchers have to make breeding decisions years before the extra beef reaches consumers. Keeping more heifers today means carrying more animals through drought, feed costs, interest costs, and market risk before seeing the payoff. That is why ranchers need a strong, reliable policy signal that the United States wants more domestic cattle production, not another round of imports. If Washington responds to every shortage with more foreign beef, it weakens the very confidence ranchers need to rebuild the herd.

New World screwworm adds another supply risk. Screwworm is a dangerous pest whose larvae feed on living tissue and can seriously harm livestock. The pest spread north through Mexico, forcing USDA to shut off live cattle imports from Mexico through southern border ports to protect the U.S. herd [10]. However, the pest now has 15 confirmed cases in the U.S. after three more animals recently tested positive in Texas [11].

For ranchers, this means more surveillance, treatment, movement restrictions, and biosecurity costs. For the country, it shows the danger of becoming dependent on foreign livestock supply. Imports from countries with weaker animal-health systems can increase the risk of pests and disease reaching the United States. And once those risks appear, the U.S. may have no choice but to shut off those foreign supply channels we’ve become reliant on, tightening cattle supply and adding more pressure to beef prices.

A concentrated meatpacking sector makes the shrinking U.S. herd more damaging. Four giant firms — Tyson Foods, JBS USA, Cargill, and National Beef — control roughly 85% of the U.S. fed-cattle market [12]. That leaves ranchers with limited processing options even before new disruptions occur.

Recent plant closures reinforce the problem. JBS’s Pennsylvania closure reduced regional processing capacity [13], and Tyson’s closure of its Nebraska beef packing plant [14] directly removed beef packing/slaughter capacity from cattle country. These closures point to the same structural weakness: large meatpackers can close or shift operations, while ranchers are left with fewer outlets, weaker bargaining power, and a supply chain more dependent on a small number of large firms. The result is a system with fewer shock absorbers at the exact moment America needs more domestic cattle production.

Conclusion: The U.S. Needs More Domestic Cattle, Not Imports

More imports are not solving the beef-price crisis. U.S. beef import volume is up 86% since 2021, yet beef prices are up 56% over the same period [1] [3]. The recent Argentine quota increase proves the point. In February 2026, President Trump added 80,000 metric tons of tariff-free beef access, but economists agree this will not lower grocery-store prices [15]. As Oklahoma State agricultural economist Derrell Peel explained, the real path to lower prices is rebuilding the U.S. cattle supply, a process that will take years and require ranchers to have enough market and policy confidence to retain more heifers for breeding [15].

The import-first policy may create the appearance of action, but it does not create one more American calf. It does not help a young rancher buy land, survive drought, secure water, or invest in more breeding stock. Worse, more imports weaken the very price signal needed to expand domestic production. Washington cannot ask ranchers to take the long-term risk of rebuilding the U.S. cattle herd while also using foreign beef to undercut the same ranchers that make expansion possible.

The long-term solution is not more imported beef. It is more American cattle. That means supporting herd rebuilding, ensuring trade policy does not undermine ranchers, restoring mandatory country-of-origin labeling, improving drought resilience, investing in animal-health defenses, and expanding regional processing capacity so ranchers are not trapped between foreign imports and dominant packers.

High beef prices are painful, but they are the predictable result of decades of shortchanging American cattle production. America’s cattle industry has been cut too deeply. Affordable beef will not come from sidelining ranchers or importing around them. It will come from rebuilding domestic cattle production.

References

[1] U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, “Average Price: Ground Beef, 100% Beef (Cost per Pound/453.6 Grams) in U.S. City Average,” retrieved via FRED, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/APU0000703112

[2] USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service, “United States Cattle Inventory Down Slightly,” January 30, 2026. https://www.nass.usda.gov/Newsroom/2026/01-30-2026.php

[3] USDA Foreign Agricultural Service, Global Agricultural Trade System (GATS), U.S. beef import data. https://apps.fas.usda.gov/gats

[4] USDA Economic Research Service, “Meat Price Spreads.” https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/meat-price-spreads

[5] Sterling Marketing, “Beef Profit Tracker,” Farm Journal, June 13, 2026. https://assets.farmjournal.com/71/72/474fe8304758b73cf9c465cf96d7/sterling-beef-profit-tracker-6-13-26.pdf

[6] USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service, 2022 Census of Agriculture. https://www.nass.usda.gov/Publications/AgCensus/2022/

[7] USDA Economic Research Service, “Livestock, Dairy, and Poultry Outlook: June 2026,” June 2026. https://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/115035

[8] Lacy, Katherine; Fuller, Kate Binzen; Skorbiansky, Sharon Raszap; and Lim, Katherine, “America’s Farms and Ranches at a Glance: 2025 Edition,” USDA Economic Research Service, Economic Information Bulletin No. 299, February 2026. https://ers.usda.gov/sites/default/files/_laserfiche/publications/113787/EIB-299.pdf

[9] Drovers, “Drought Stalls Expansion: 75% of U.S. Beef Cows in Dry Conditions,” 2026. https://www.drovers.com/news/drought-stalls-expansion-75-u-s-beef-cows-dry-conditions

[10] USDA, “Secretary Rollins Takes Decisive Action and Shuts Down U.S. Southern Border Ports to Livestock Trade Due to Further Northward Spread of New World Screwworm in Mexico,” July 9, 2025. https://www.usda.gov/about-usda/news/press-releases/2025/07/09/secretary-rollins-takes-decisive-action-and-shuts-down-us-southern-border-ports-livestock-trade-due

[11] Reuters, “USDA Reports Three New Cases of Screwworm, Bringing Total to 15,” June 22, 2026. https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/usda-reports-three-new-cases-screwworm-bringing-total-15-2026-06-22/

[12] USDA Economic Research Service, “Concentration in U.S. Meatpacking Industry and How It Affects Competition and Cattle Prices,” Amber Waves, January 2024. https://www.ers.usda.gov/amber-waves/2024/january/concentration-in-u-s-meatpacking-industry-and-how-it-affects-competition-and-cattle-prices

[13] JBS USA, “JBS USA Announces Network Changes to Strengthen Operations,” June 12, 2026. https://jbsfoodsgroup.com/articles/jbs-usa-announces-network-changes-to-strengthen-operations

[14] Polansek, Tom, “Tyson Foods Continues Limited Operations at Closing US Beef Plant,” Reuters, January 23, 2026. https://www.reuters.com/business/tyson-foods-continues-limited-operations-closing-us-beef-plant-2026-01-23/

[15] Cunningham, Mary, “More Argentina Beef Imports Won’t Do Much to Ease Costs for Consumers, According to Experts,” CBS News, February 9, 2026. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-beef-trade-argentina-executive-order/

The latest CPA news and updates, delivered every Friday.

NEWSLETTER

CPA ADVOCACY ISSUES